With Joba’s role becoming clear for 2009, the critics are out in full force. Joel Sherman (NY Post) believes that the Yankees should throw Joba right into the fire, having him begin the season as our 5th starter, which would allow the Yanks to skip several of his starts along the way. Then we have Jim Baumbach (Newsday), who thinks that Joba should probably just stay in the minors and work on innings there so that he can help the team, as a starter, with no restrictions on his young arm.
Now, I understand the reasoning behind both arguments. With Sherman, the 5th starter idea seems workable. However, Sherman’s idea is contingent upon having a 6th starter, skipping starts (here and there), and so on and so forth. Sherman believes that Joba should be a starter for the entire season so that he may avoid bouncing from the ‘pen to the rotation and concentrate on what he is really meant to do (be an ace). He thinks that the wear and tear of switching roles could truly harm his arm. Nevertheless, since we always hear about pitchers being creatures of habit, the same could be said about skipping starts and not keeping Joba on a steady schedule (as a starter). But, the idea still seems fairly viable, although Sherman notes that he would like to keep Joba’s pitch count down for the first 2 months of the season, as a starter. Why not just do what the Yankees have done this year and let him build up his arm through the bullpen, it’s the same concept, essentially.
Jim Baumbach’s idea is less enticing. He basically says that it’s better for Joba to go through the “buildup process” in the minors, instead of at the major league level. The problem here is that Joba has truly helped the Yankees at the major league level, even when he’s building his arm up (whether it’s in the ‘pen, during the transition stage, or as a starter). Joba has been very dominant, so why not keep him around, even for the buildup process, especially if the Yankees can benefit from it. Also, this has been a great way for him to get used to big time hitters and big time situations. He’s learning a lot at the major league level, while being very effective. The buildup process isn’t a new one, either. Joba is doing what Johan Santana did, what Chad Billingsley did, and what Brandon Morrow is currently doing, so baseball people are confident with this strategy. Baumbach goes on to wonder whether or not the buildup process will take 3 or even 4 years to complete (complete = 200+ innings), calling it “endless”. But, remember, even if it does take 3 or even 4 years to get a full season out of Joba, he’ll only be what, 25 at that time? Look at Paul Maholm, who is having a great season. He’s in his 3rd full year as a starter (4 years total), and the Pirates are still being careful with him as he approaches the 200 inning mark (he’s 26).
There’s really no right or wrong way to do this, as there are varying opinions, but the way the Yankees have done it this year seems like a good fit (the results are there and Joba is, for the most part, healthy outside of the tendinitis issue). If Joba can get to 140 innings in 2009, the 5th starter idea wouldn’t be a bad one since they wouldn’t have to skip him too often. The Yankees could go a totally different route as well, and may choose to sign another starter to bolster their rotation, which would allow Joba to pitch out of the bullpen for the entire year (he’d have to hit 130-140 IP) and then take over for Andy Pettitte (likely) or even Mike Mussina in 2010.












